Technology investments often fail because governance is missing or ineffective.
Technology investments often fail because governance is missing or ineffective.
Effective governance must be tailored to an organization’s culture and strategy.
Common governance gaps include shadow IT, siloed decision making, unclear ownership and unmeasured performance.
Explore how RSM helps leaders align tech investments with business value—before the next one goes sideways.
Technology investments often fail to deliver expected value—not because the tech is wrong, but because governance is missing. Governance isn’t just a compliance checkbox. It’s the connective tissue that aligns IT decisions with business strategy, ensures accountability and enables value creation.
Too often, leaders misunderstand governance as a bureaucratic slowdown. But when done right, it’s a strategic accelerator. Governance helps organizations prioritize investments, manage risk and measure performance. Especially in the middle market, where resources are tight and stakes are high, governance can make or break a transformation.
Governance means different things to different people. For some, it’s about compliance. For others, it’s about process or risk. Frameworks like COBIT and Val IT focus on value delivery, portfolio management and investment governance.
But frameworks alone aren’t enough. Governance must be tailored to the organization’s culture, structure and strategic goals. It’s about making governance usable—not just documented.
Technology is no longer just a support function—it’s a strategic partner. That shift demands a governance model that aligns IT with corporate objectives. Effective leaders build governance frameworks that center on value: who makes decisions, how those decisions are made and how accountability is enforced across people, processes and platforms.
Often, the first step is to establish a technology steering committee. It’s not just about oversight—it’s about awareness, alignment and shared ownership of outcomes.
Even the best frameworks can fail if they’re misapplied. Culture matters. Leadership matters. Governance must be lived—not just written down.
If governance is too rigid or complex, people will find ways around it. It’s best to emphasize simplicity, transparency and stakeholder engagement.
Symptoms of ineffective governance include the following:
These aren’t just operational issues—they’re strategic risks.
Fixing governance starts with understanding where you are. Current-state assessments look at strategic alignment, value delivery, risk management and performance. From there, clients can build the right structures—steering committees, project management offices, architecture review boards—and define clear roles and responsibilities with respective opportunity intake processes and investment prioritization frameworks.
Governance must be iterative. It needs feedback loops, change management and ongoing communication. Priorities shift, and people change. Governance must evolve with them.
If you only have 30 seconds with your chief information officer, ask this: “Do we have the governance in place to ensure our tech investments deliver business value?” If the answer isn’t clear, it’s time to act.
Governance isn’t a side conversation—it’s a strategic imperative. And fixing it before your next investment could be the difference between transformation and stagnation.