Canada

Is your business prepared for a visit from the CRA?

TAX ALERT  | 

In several successive federal budgets, the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) has been increasingly funded by the Federal government to combat tax leakage across the spectrum of direct and indirect taxes that it administers, from base erosion profit shifting to GST/HST audits.  In the last two years, we have clearly seen the effects of this funding through the CRA’s hiring of many new auditors, many of whom are straight out of university or college and highly proficient in the use of technology and researching tax laws. In other words, the CRA has many more auditors than ever before, and they are keener and arguably more proficient and efficient than ever before.

For example, we have seen this firsthand translate into a 300-400 per cent increase in the number of GST/HST desk and field audits of clients across many industry sectors. More recently, the CRA has been getting more aggressive with their tax positions during the course of their audits. Examples of this include situations where clients being audited don’t provide the necessary information in a timely manner, the CRA’s auditors are now automatically assuming all sales and taxable supplies reported on the return, are subject to 15 per cent HST and denying all input tax credits (“ITCs”) during their preliminary reviews. These assessing positions have translated into much larger preliminary audit adjustment risk than we have seen in the past. This tactic is intended to get registrants’ attention to comply with the information requests in a timely manner, and it is clearly working.

In several of these cases, clients were wise to get tax professionals involved early on to help them prepare for the audit and in some cases, help them manage or undertake the audit with the CRA from start to finish. In other cases, RSM's tax team was able to work in the background and coach clients through the audit process. Often, the audit preparation phase resulted in “no-change” audits, or with very few changes where the CRA’s auditors were much easier to work with, and there were no surprises for the client.

We have also seen clients request assistance after submitting the information themselves and receiving a large adjustment in their proposal letters. In these situations, we worked to assist the client in reducing the initial proposal by the CRA; however, in our experience, once the CRA finds a position with their audits it can often be difficult to change their stance. 

AUTHORS


Subscribe to our newsletters

Subscribe


HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?

Contact us by phone +1.855.420.8473 or submit your questions, comments or proposal requests


CONTACT

Maria Severino

National Tax Leader


Recent Tax Alerts

Tax Court applies sham doctrine to disallow partnership losses

Will the CRA increase its use of the sham doctrine as a basis to reassess taxpayers? Read here for further details.

  • November 13, 2019

2019 Post-election review of potential tax changes

This article highlights proposed tax measures presented by the Liberal Party of Canada in their 2019 election platform.

  • November 08, 2019

TCC confirms shareholder benefit not taxable if value is uncertain

The Tax Court held that a shareholder didn’t receive taxable benefits when her corporation completed leasehold improvements to her property.

  • October 30, 2019

Does the TOSI reasonable return exclusion apply to family trusts?

Our tax group examines the conditions when the reasonable return exclusion applies to taxpayers receiving dividends from a family business.

  • October 24, 2019

Quebec government adds to its arsenal against aggressive tax planning

Quebec government fights abusive tax avoidance by proposing rules that may impact taxpayers with GAAR-based penalties.

  • October 16, 2019