B.C. and Saskatchewan indicated that a billing address can generally be used to determine where the services will be used. However, B.C.’s new regulations advise using an IP address to determine location as the billing address may differ from where the device is located physically.
Why new U.S. rules matter for Canadian businesses
The IRS released its final regulations on Jan. 10, 2025 regarding the classification of digital content transactions and cloud transactions. It also announced proposed regulations regarding the determination of the source of income from cloud transactions.
These regulatory changes have meaningful implications for companies with cross-border operations. In addition to determining whether income earned by foreign entities in the U.S. is subject to U.S. tax, the changes affect U.S. taxation of:
- Withholdable payments made to non-U.S. recipients.
- Foreign tax credits.
- Income earned by foreign affiliates of U.S. entities.
Canadian businesses with international customers, or with operations like servers in the U.S., should carefully review these revised regulations to understand their potential effects.
Like the aforementioned provincial changes, the U.S. regulations permit taxpayers to use the billing address of the purchaser of digital content to determine where purchasers are located.
Conversely, the proposed rules for cloud transactions would determine U.S.-sourced gross income using a formula that looks at three cost-based factors tied to the provider’s intangibles and R&D, personnel and tangible property such as servers. The income is sourced to the U.S. to the extent those factors are located or performed in the U.S.
The proposed sourcing rules would apply specifically on a taxpayer‑by‑taxpayer basis—focused on the entity’s own employees and assets—and would not use customer or end‑user location or contract‑execution location as a proxy.
However, an anti-abuse rule under the regulations allows the IRS to adjust the source of income if a transaction is structured with a principal purpose of reducing U.S. tax liability in a manner inconsistent with the purpose of the rules.