Customers and suppliers of the affected businesses are exposed to heightened financial and cyber risk.
High Contrast
Customers and suppliers of the affected businesses are exposed to heightened financial and cyber risk.
Many industries are vulnerable to bad actors looking to profit from the market disruption.
Middle market firms need to address their cyber risk as well as their financial and counterparty risk.
Heightened financial and cyber risk are unfortunate byproducts of any market disruption. As companies scramble to transition accounts from one financial institution to another and assess the impact on their supply chains and critical vendors, the unanticipated increase in transactional activity creates vulnerability to bad actors seeking to profit from the market disruption. Customers and suppliers of the affected businesses are exposed to heightened financial and cyber risk as detailed information relating to payables and receivables is transferred to new institutions.
The recent collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank has had a disproportionate impact on certain industries due to customer concentrations at those institutions: private equity; venture capital; life sciences; technology, media and telecoms; and commercial real estate. But the risk created by this disruption extends beyond these industries into the supply chains of other sectors, notably manufacturing and consumer products.
The impact on the affected businesses will be felt across multiple departments as efforts are undertaken to mitigate risk. Leaders of organizations with mature third-party and cyber risk management programs should leverage their existing infrastructure to support risk assessment efforts; meanwhile, those companies with limited third-party and cyber risk management programs require leaders across multiple departments to lean in to evaluate and effectively manage risk.
We have identified some critical near-term actions that businesses can take in response to the banking market disruption:
The first step in risk mitigation calls for assessing the exposure to your counterparties—both financial and nonfinancial. These steps will help with the assessment:
Performing due diligence on new banking or critical vendor relationships affected by the market disruption is important and should include more scrutiny than a business-as-usual scenario. Consider the following:
Reinforce procedural protocols across departments to ensure consistency and encourage teams to critically evaluate all new requests, including key changes to existing stakeholder information.
You may want to add additional layers of authorization for payments and fund transfers. These include the following:
Creating internal awareness of the threat landscape is integral to protecting your assets, as well as your proprietary information and technologies. Recommended activities include:
Your IT teams should consider stepping up surveillance around failed logins, including failed multifactor authentication attempts. Consider these additional steps:
During periods of market disruption, understanding the risk to your business operations from counterparty relationships becomes increasingly important. Businesses often take a departmental approach that can overlook broader enterprise risk.
At RSM, we take a holistic view when assessing risk and develop a customized approach tailored to your unique third-party strategy and business goals. Our comprehensive enterprise risk methodology helps you address major risk sources. These sources include cyber; strategic; compliance; operational; transactional; environmental, social and governance (ESG); and reputational.